Saturday, 6 December 2014


My blacklisting campaign is over after nine thankless years. The Select Committee have not sat on this since early July 2014 and appear to have lost interest. I can therefore see no logical reason to continue working on this.

The compensation scheme also appears to be the end of this for many of the 3213 and I'd like to briefly explain why. When a settlement is offered and refused and a claimant then continues with their legal action, they could be at risk of the other sides costs.

The claimants in this action appear to be protected by the no win no fee element, so the legal firms and trade unions bringing these claims appear to take the risk. That risk however is going to increase enormously as this progresses and we have already seen claimants being released from the current High Court claims.

I'm pretty sure the claims will stand should they progress to a full trial, but the subsequent problem at a costs hearing will be the efforts the claimants made to mitigate their losses. I have previously published a separate post on my concerns about this here:

My claim from the scheme is now complete and the entire process takes about two months as the scheme administrators have to write to the ICO for the files. The ICO process these requests once a month.

If you do decide to enter the scheme you will get £250 for legal advice. The scheme administrators provide you with details of two law firms, but I would strongly recommend you use Mark Lampkin, who is the principle solicitor at Lampkin and Co.

Mark is a personal friend and has a great understanding of the blacklisting issues, helping me personally with my campaign over the last few years. I have posted a link to his website here:


It would appear that this is my very last post on this matter and I sincerely hope that my efforts and the sacrifices I've made have helped some of you.

Saturday, 29 November 2014


By far the most accurate piece of journalism reporting on this to date:



Monday, 10 November 2014


Did Drake & Scull (Emcor plc) distribute the (Sheila Knight and Michael Aird) lists from the Jubilee Line Extention, Royal Opera House and Pfizer projects to those attending the 'Major Projects Association' Jubilee Line Extension seminar in November 2000?

This takes place three months after those lists are exchanged between Balfour Beatty Engineering Services and Drake & Scull (Emcor) and distributed to the Drake & Scull (Emcor) labour managers. 

Tuesday, 4 November 2014


Sir Peter Mason

Mason has served as a Director of at least three Consulting Association members (Amec, Balfour Beatty and SPIE) and was also appointed to the Olympic Delivery Authority in 2006. Mason is currently on the board of directors at Subsea 7, where he has served in different roles since 2006.


Kevin Gorman

Kevin Gormans' involvement in the blacklisting is well documented, but one noticeable omission from his Linkedin profile is his recent spell as HR Director at Subsea 7.

This is highlighted in Harkands' announcement on his appointment as Vice President of HR last year in which they wrote:

"Gorman brings with him a wealth of experience across the construction, engineering and oil and gas industries both within the UK and internationally. Most recently HR Director at Subsea 7 where he oversaw the merger with Acergy"


This puts Gorman and Mason together at Subsea 7 at the same time.

Lord Geoffrey Howe

Mason joins the board of Balfour Beatty PLC on 1 Jan 1993 (after working for them since 1975) following no other than Lord Geoffrey Howe who joined in April 1992. Balfour Beatty plc is Lord Howe's only business directorship following his retirement from politics and he leaves the company on 30 April 1997 (the day before the general election).

The following people also join Howe on the board at Balfour Beatty plc on the exact same day in April 1992. Sir Robert James Davidson, Sir Robin Adair Biggam, Eric Clark, Sir Peter Leahy Bonfield, Harry C Schell and HRH The Duke of Kent.

The Major Projects Association

Mason becomes the Director and Chief Executive of a company called the Major Projects Association in July 1992. Andrew McNaughton (recently retired/sacked/whatever they want to call it by Balfours) joins this company as a Director from Nov 2007 to Dec 2010. This is currently headed up by Princess Anne's husband, Sir Tim Laurence.

1-4 employees and over half a million in the bank.

Jubilee Line Extension & Newbury Bypass

The Major Projects Association hold around 5-10 confidential seminars a year for their paying members. Two of these in 2000 were the subject of the Jubilee Line Extension (Nov 2000) and the Newbury Bypass (March 2000). Summary reports are available which refer to industrial relations problems and the solutions devised and implemented. The full reports are only available to the membership.



These summary reports are self explanatory and detail:

"care has been taken to ensure that its contents do not breach confidentiality. This account cannot, therefore, do full justice to the event"

What is clear is that the participants of these events included major construction companies (Balfour Beatty, Costain, Laing, etc), representatives from the police, private detective agencies, lawyers and Government departments (Treasury Solicitors, Ministry of Defence, Defence Procurement Agency).

Friday, 31 October 2014


Email to the Chairman of the Harkand Audit Committee in relation to their 'Mission, Vision, Values and Ethics' policy:


"Dear Mr Laloe

I'm writing to you in your capacity of Chairman of the Harkand Audit Committee.

You may or may not be aware that the GMB union are holding a demonstration at your Aberdeen premises against your HR Director, Kevin Gorman for his role in the construction industry blacklisting scandal. I worked with Mr Gorman at Carillion and was the whistleblower who exposed the blacklisting:

I go into detail about Mr Gormans' participation in this on my website and evidence to the parliamentary select committee:

The GMB have also produced a detailed breakdown of Mr Gormans' participation, which has also been reported in the following news article:

I would draw your attention to your company's values and ethics policy which states:

9. Suspected Breach of Harkand’s Conduct of Business Policy
If you have a reason to believe that someone, or a situation, is or might be causing a breach of this Conduct of Business Policy, you must promptly contact either your supervisor, the Group Compliance Officer, Kevin Gorman ( or the Chairman of the Harkand Audit Committee, Jean-Luc Laloƫ ( Choose the person you are the most comfortable contacting under the circumstances. Any such whistle-blowing will be taken seriously, and no good-faith report will result in disciplinary action against the person making the report.

I would also like to inform you that I have personally reached out to Mr Gorman at his previous employers asking him to come forward with any information he may have that could have helped expose the blacklisting, which was ignored.

I'm sure you will reach your own opinion on whether Mr Gorman has breached your 'Conduct of Business Policy'.

Best regards,
Alan Wainwright"


Wednesday, 15 October 2014


Balfour Beatty plc Company Secretary, Christopher Rait O'Neil Pearson and Haden Young Director, Lawson Elliott.

You're both up next!

Both coincidentally or not retired from their positions (source Duedil) only a few weeks after David Clancy raided the offices of Haden Young (Balfour Beatty Engineering Services) in August 2008.

Saturday, 4 October 2014


It's probably an apt time to highlight that my initial attempted protected disclosure back in 2005 was not about the Blacklisting. It was about financial irregularities in Balfour Beatty's mechanical and electrical (M&E) services business. Building Magazine are currently reporting that £30 million of Balfour Beatty's current profit warning is associated to the M&E business.

It concerned the overbooking of bonus targets by supervisors and chargehands (who were included in the bonus scheme they administered) to enhance the bonus payments to themselves and site operatives on major projects. 

This practice has a significant detrimental effect on a projects' profitability, as the company still has to pay the operatives again at their hourly rate to complete the work previously booked via the bonus sheets as 100% complete. In effect, the company are paying twice for the labour costs to complete these overbooked sections.

I was not alone in raising these concerns. The following is a letter dated 1 June 2005 from a site supervisor (Nick Batt) at the Coventry Arena project to the Managing Director, David Beck. In this he describes the process of how the previous supervision had moved on to other employment after creaming off all the bonus. 

The letter also highlights that Nick raised these concerns with a number of senior managers, including me. I was isolated, forced out of the business and signed off work sick by my doctor with work related stress at the time and only learned of the existence of this letter well over a year later when it was produced during disclosure for my Employment Tribunal in November 2006.




My concerns about these financial irregularities and the company's blacklisting procedures are all detailed in the following post:



Balfour Beatty shedding senior executives according to Building magazine.


Bob Clark mentioned in my post below from 6 August 2014. Gone a month later.




The following came through by email last night from TCWCS.


This was followed by an email (via my website) from none other than Graylings MD, Rebecca Gudgeon in which she wrote:

"Alan, the TCWCS administrators have written directly to you explaining why a leak from the scheme administrators is impossible."

Rebecca's profile on Graylings' website states that she provides crisis management consultancy to Sir Robert MacAlpine.

So here we are again with everybody denying everything. Only Mark Leftly and his source know the truth.

Tuesday, 30 September 2014


I recently attempted to make an online enquiry to the scheme and went onto the website for more information.

In short, many elements of the website don't work. The date pick lists on the online enquiry form do not allow entries past September 2004, which makes it impossible to complete the online enquiry. 

I therefore called the help line and was informed that I would need to download the forms manually from the 'forms and info' link.

This too did not work, returning a 'page not found' error message. There are similar 'page not found' error messages for other elements of the website including the 'Scheme Rules'.



So I called the helpline again and spoke to someone who emailed the forms over.


On returning home from visiting a friend in hospital last Wednesday I found an email from Mark Leftly, who is the Associate Business Editor at the Independent on Sunday.

"Can I talk to you tomorrow. I have a blacklisting story involving you".

I replied with the usual rejection, to which he responded:

"Ok but this is a story that involves you directly. I really think you'll want to hear the story I have got".

Again I gave him the usual rejection, to which he responded:

"Fair enough - but I assure you I'm different to most other journalists".

This third email included a comment about a specific amount of compensation which I had only discussed with three people. A solicitor at Leigh Day (GMB lawyers), a board director at Balfour Beatty plc and the person I had to contact from TCWCS as the website wasn't working.

This concerned me, so I gave it twenty four hours and gave Mr Leftly a call. He didn't have a story. He informed me that a source had informed him that I had applied to the scheme for the specific amount mentioned in his previous email. I asked him who his source was but he would not reveal this, stating that he never reveals his sources.

Now I'm assured that both the solicitor and BB director had not discussed this specific point with anyone, which appears to leave only one person. The administrator at TCWCS.

Mr Leftlys' carrot dangling tactics detailed above are the exact reason why I rarely talk to journalists. He is not different from most journalists as you can see from the dialogue. Someone somewhere leaked the details of what should have been a totally confidential matter and he sought to take advantage of this. 

So beware if you're a blacklisted worker considering accessing the scheme. 

It's also not that fast track.

1. You complete the relevant enquiry forms, which have to be sent out to you as the website is knackered.

2. TCWCS write to the ICO to see if you are eligible, which they say could take up to 40 days for a response.

3. TCWCS then write to you either confirming or denying eligibility.

4. If eligible, you then get £250 to discuss your claim with a solicitor.

5. You then either make your application or not, as is your choice.

6. It is only 14 days after the application is received that you receive your money.

In reality, it could take a couple of months, so not so fast track.

Thursday, 7 August 2014


40,000 page views as of today, with 1,000 in the last week!

Please keep sending information in to:

If you want to remain anonymous, go set up a new gmail account to email from.

Wednesday, 6 August 2014


We have a CA file with the following:

"2006 Nov 17th: Applied to 3223/F (Balfour Kilpatrick) via agency N.R.L. for various contracts in Newcastle area.
Main contact (B.C.) given details.
Co. has not furthered"

Who is B.C. from the Balfour Beatty Group?

Could it be Bob Clark who is now the Executive Director on the Executive Leadership Team?


Tuesday, 5 August 2014


My sister lives in Australia and about two years ago told me about a work presentation she'd attended by an organisation looking to provide her company with workers/staff. She worked for the YMCA at the time, who employ over 13,000 people over 600 locations.

She contacted me, as this presentation involved the demonstration of a recruitment software package. She informed me that during this software demonstration, that the person demonstrating this made specific references to being able to blacklist people and demonstrated how this was managed within the system. She said that he'd specifically used the word "blacklist", which obviously alerted her knowing about my experiences over here.

I didn't think much of it at the time as this was Australia, but I did go back to her sometime later to ask who the company was. She said it was Randstad. 

I did have a brief discussion with Justin Bowden about this at the time, but there was no connection to anything else we had, so I left it.

In the previous post about NRL, I refer to their recruitment software provider, Safe Computing and their Internet/Cloud based recruitment software. Their website boasts that 8 of the top 10 UK recruitment companies use their software, so I made a call into sales to ask who these companies were.

I was told Addeco, Blue Arrow, Impellam Group and Randstad...

Okay, so there is no definitive proof that any of these companies are blacklisting, but do we potentially have a couple of new pieces of the jigsaw?


Wednesday, 30 July 2014


When I first started this journey nine years ago it was just me, my word and my evidence against the vast majority of the UK construction industry. They accused me of being a liar and a fantasist and lied under oath at my tribunal. They must have also thrown hundreds of thousands of pounds at lawyers in a bid to contain this.

I turned down a £20,000 settlement and had to borrow a further £17,000 to get my blacklisting evidence into the public domain without fear of legal reprisal. I had to live off my credit card whilst off sick and unemployed, a debt which still cripples me monthly, as I'm still only able to pay the minimum amount. And then there's loss of earnings...

My evidence was presented to a regional official of Unite and their then General Secretary, but they buried it and left me alone and isolated with this. The hypocrites are now shouting about this from the rooftops, but they are just as complicit in condoning this back then, leaving this deep underground for years to come.

I mention all this as I think we start that journey again today with this new evidence about the employment agency sector. Tribunals and legal claims have been thrown aside because blacklisted workers were working through third party employment agencies.

So here is my post:

Following the recent suspicions that blacklisting may have moved to the recruitment agencies providing labour to the construction industry, I went back to some information provided by an ex colleague at Carillion, Mike Connolly.

Carillion had their own in house recruitment agency NCS (Postworth Limited) providing over a thousand construction tradesmen to their projects and my role was to set up a mechanical and electrical (M&E) division, which I did successfully. Mike was brought in a few years later to work in the NCS M&E business, but had no knowledge of the CA at the time. Mike has subsequently worked for AMEC and Haden Young (Balfour Beatty Engineering Services) in similar labour recruitment roles.


In May 2010 Mike provided some information regarding the construction labour agency, NRL. I missed this at the time as it didn't seem that relative with everything else that was going on.

NRL were one of our three main preferred agency labour suppliers during my time at Carillion and have grown to be the fifth largest agency in the construction sector according to their website.

NRL originate from Cumbria and their M&E office in Washington in the North East. They now have offices around the UK, including bases at Grangemouth and Sellafield.

The news section on their websites boasts that their turnover has increased 60% in the first six months of 2014 (against that of 2013), rising from £55 million to around £90 million.

My contact at the time was Gillian Cordner, who is now Gillian Gomersall and a Director of the business (still running the M&E nationally out of the Washington office)


NRL's website also reveals that they have long standing relationships with many large construction companies, with at least three testimonials from senior Directors of companies involved with the CA.

"Phil, Balfour Beatty Engineering Services

We have enjoyed a very close and open relationship since 1990, and I commend NRL as a truly capable and experienced recruitment company able to provide no-nonsense, quality, value-for-money recruitment."

Could this be Phil McGuire, MD at Balfour Beatty Engineering Services until May 2014? Well his Linkedin profile states that he's based in Newcastle.
"Steve, Shepherd Engineering Services

NRL consistently provide high quality and cost-effective labour solutions, frequently within critical timescales. The honesty and integrity of our relationship, as well as their knowledge and experience of the Mechanical and Electrical Industry, has allowed NRL to remain one of our supply chain partners for 19 years."

Could this be Steve Joyce, Regional Director in the north east since 1992? Of course it is.
"Steve, Amec Nuclear UK Ltd
NRL have been providing the radiography service for AMEC for several years at the Sellafield site. I have found them to be reliable, flexible and professional in carrying out their duties in what is sometimes a very tight timescale. I look forward to carrying on this relationship in the future and would recommend them to other companies. "
SSE Contracting

There is also a glowing reference from SSE Contracting and although they were not in any way connected to the CA (as far as I'm aware), they do have a longstanding dispute with Steve Acheson regarding his sacking at Fiddlers Ferry and failed miserably with their High Court claim in 2009 to have his protest removed from outside their Fiddlers Ferry power station in Warrington.
"Jeff, SSE Contracting

I recently celebrated 20 years of service with SSE Contracting Limited and I believe it appropriate to mark the occasion with a heartfelt ‘Thank You’ to a number of our construction industry partners who have supported our operation.
During my period with SSE Contracting, our team has successfully developed the E & I Business into one of the UK’s leading and most respected companies in that sector. Underpinning our success has been the magnificent support we’ve enjoyed from a number of key companies on our supply chain, one of which is our premier agency labour provider, NRL.
When called upon by our team, NRL’s Washington operation has been able to support us with a service that is both professional and consistent with integrity beyond reproach"
Mike Connolly

In May 2010 Mike informed me that he had worked at NRL and my research indicates that this was very briefly i.e. late 2009 to early 2010.

Mike had access to their database system and stated that this held records on certain individuals, including Steve Acheson, Graham Bowker and Tony Jones, clearly stating under the 'Availability' status:  

"Please Contact Gillian Gomersall".

I've attached screenshots of two Facebook exchanges with Mike from January and May 2010.

NRL 1 - JAN 2010 

NRL 2 - MAY 2010 

Mike talks about this system (Adapt) being phased out, but for the layman, this does not mean they would delete all their records. The worker records are the life blood of their business, so these would have been merged into the new system.

NRL now use a web based system from Safe Computing, which has client portals for their clients to log on to exchange information.

Safe Computing boast that 8 of the top 10 UK recruitment businesses use their system.



So we have a Director of a major construction recruitment agency with very long standing business relations with and testimonials from companies known to be associated with the CA.

We have a recruitment manager who has worked at Carillion, Amec and Haden Young (Balfour Beatty Engineering Services) and NRL, stating that NRL held database records of known blacklisted workers and that those records state that NRL staff must contact a Director of the business (Gillian Gomersall) when considering certain individuals for employment/placement with their clients.


Further research reveals that NRL have been the respondent to at least one employment tribunal claim and appeal in conjunction with Balfour Beatty Engineering Services.

More information can be found at:


Indeed, Graham Bowker (mentioned above by Mike Connolly) was the subject of a pre-hearing at the Manchester Employment Tribunal with NRL, Balfour Beatty Engineering Services, Carillion, NG Bailey and Beaver Management Services in March 2011. I do not know how this progressed.

So here we are again, with what appears to be the start of the process again. So I'll ask my question again.

Did blacklisting continue via the agency suppliers to the members of the Consulting Association post March 2009?



Q: How does a barrister know when someone is lying when giving evidence?

A: Body language...

If you briefly study Callum Tuckett's evidence at 14:54:40, 15:19:20, 15:28:00, 15:48:31, 16:05:57 and 16:06:35, you will see he uses his hands quite freely to express himself.


Now Mr Tuckett didn't get to the top of the construction industry pay chain without picking up a few tips about body language, but if you study him closely around 16:08:57 when Simon Reevell starts questioning him about Roger Robinson, Carillion and NCS you'll see a noticeable change.

Q1: Hands on desk playing with pen, moving to raised hands clasped

In this specific evidence, Mr Tuckett states that Roger Robinson has "now retired from the business, was most recently chief executive of the European hub business, responsible for pretty much half of the business".

It is at the end of this sentence where Mr Tuckett's hands become clasped in the raised position.

Now I don't know if Roger has now retired from the business, but all the press releases state that he was standing down as Chief exec of the European business, but was remaining in a senior role.

Quote Construction News 24 March 2014

"Mr Robinson will remain in the company as “a senior executive with responsibility for a wide range of important relationships and aspects of the business including Laing O’Rourke’s joint venture with Bouygues at Hinkley Point C”, according to a Laing O’Rourke spokesman."

Q2: Hands clasped, face down

In this specific evidence Mr Tuckett states that he was on the same board as Roger from 2010 to 2012, but a simple search on reveals them both to be on the same board of Laing O'Rourke PLC until 14 March 2014.


I don't intend to go into any further detail breaking down the rest of Mr Tuckett's evidence in this brief exchange with Simon, but his body language continue as:

Q3: Puts one hand on top of another and draws hands close to body
Q4: One hand on top of another close to body
Q5: Hands clasped in front
Q6: Hands clasped in front
Q7: Hands clasped in front

Mr Tuckett's hands return to playing with his pen when Lindsay Roy takes over.

Now you can go and make your own inquiries into what this body language means, but quite simply, clasped hands denotes anxiety and is the act of holding oneself in place to suppress the tension inside.

Body language coach, Nicolas Fradet describes clasped hands as follows:

"Clasped hands with interwoven fingers indicate great anxiety and frustration. That person is thinking, things are going really bad"

Thankfully, being a barrister, Simon knows all this.

Thursday, 24 July 2014


Did blacklisting continue via the agency suppliers to the members of the Consulting Association post March 2009?

I have today forwarded evidence that this may be the case to David Clancy at the ICO and a member of the select committee.

This is brand new evidence, not previously submitted, considered  or published. It's also not NCS or Atlanco Rimec.

I've informed the ICO that I'll publish this potential evidence a week from today, giving them time to act on this in the meantime should they wish to do so.

Watch this space. I don't publish anything I can't back up, as you know...

Thursday, 17 July 2014

CARILLION - NCS (National Construction Services)

I've previously mentioned Sandy Palmer and Dave Aspinall from Carillion's in house agency NCS (National Construction Services) in my written and verbal evidence to the committee.

They are detailed on CA file 2e here:


Roger Robinson (mentioned in yesterday's hearing by Simon Reevell) who was a main board Director at Carillion until 2010 was also a main board Director with Callum Tuckett at Laing O'Rourke Plc until March 2014. Roger was also a Director of Carillion's NCS (Postworth Limited) in house labour recruitment business (Source Duedil).

It was Roger who interviewed me for and gave me the position of NCS (M&E) manager within Carillion in 1993.

I did provide the following information to the select committee in March 2013, but it does not appear to have been acted upon.

An internet search reveals Sandy Palmer as Managing Director of a similarly named recruitment business in Telford called NCS - Network Construction Services until 2010. This appears to have been set up around 2002.

A further internet search also reveals Dave Aspinall as a Director of this company from 2005. This is the same Sandy Palmer and Dave Aspinall from Carillion's NCS, although the internet search reveals that Sandy Palmer is registered as Thomas Alexander Luke Palmer. Sandy is his nickname. Here is the search:

So these two key people, both with very long term careers, pensions, etc. suddenly leave their very secure roles at Carillion to work at NCS Network Construction Services.

Considering the evidence already submitted to the select committee about Sandy and Dave's association with the Consulting Association whilst at Carillion, and the recent concerns raised about employment agency Atlanco Rimec, I have written to a member of the committee to highlight this again.

I simply cannot understand how Richard Howson has not been called in for questioning by the select committee, considering his long term stance that Carillion's association with the CA was limited to "a Crown House subsidiary". 

Tarmac/Carillion employees Sandy, Dave, John Ball and Personnel Director, Frank Duggan are all on the files submitted in my evidence to the select committee. 

If FD (at 2b in the CA files above) is not Frank Duggan, then maybe Mr Howson would like to enlighten us as to who this was from within the company. 

It should be noted that there is also a reference to a DW in the same CA file 2b. In addition to Sandy Palmer and Dave Aspinall, there was only one other manager employed at Carillion's NCS at the time I was there.

Dave Whitelaw...

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

DEAL OR NO DEAL (Updated 18/07/2014)

If you’re a blacklisted worker, who too like myself has spent a considerable amount of time at home, you will most probably have watched this popular game show.

The contestants battle with the dilemma of taking the financial offer presented, against holding out for the potential of more. Those tempting big red boxes glow brightly on the big screen, but that lure has caused many to leave with little or nothing.

I don’t have the statistics, but some take the offer, some get considerably more, and some leave with considerably less or nothing.

I wonder how many like me applied to go on this show in the hope that it would ease the financial burden caused by getting caught up in this scandal.

However, with the launch of the construction workers compensation scheme you are now the contestant. Your blacklist file is your box. So many on the show comment on how different it is sitting in the driving seat, as opposed to sitting on the sidelines, opening the boxes for others. So what should you do?

There is an offer on the table and the question you have to ask yourself is, do I take this or do I hold out for more.

As promised, I hope to be able to help blacklisted workers make that decision by providing some impartial advice from my own experience of this matter. This will most probably take a few days to thrash out, as there are complex issues to consider. So I will start with the subject of time and expand on the other factors over the next few days.


It’s perceived by many that the legal process of exposing the blacklisting started in 2009. It did not.  This started in August 2005 when I started raising my concerns about being blacklisted with my employer, Balfour Beatty subsidiary, Haden Young.

Many legal exchanges took place culminating in my tribunal in November 2006, which I lost. It then took Steve Acheson and myself two more years working to expose this until David Clancy at the ICO picked up on this and raided the offices of the Consulting Association in 2008.

The Labour Goverment (1997 - 2010) and the trade unions did nothing to help us gain any recompense and it was only through the diligent work and commitment from Guney Clark Ryan and subsequently Ian Davidson and the Scottish Affairs Committee in 2012 that we now have at least, some offer of compensation on the table.

So the first thing to consider is, how long is this likely to continue if you hold out for more money? It was revealed in evidence to the select committee yesterday that the Master hearing this in the High Court hopes to have this heard by April 2016. The evidence yesterday also revealed that the companies appear to have little contrition, and appear only to be trying to stretch the legal process to force blacklisted workers to take the settlement on offer now.

A compensation scheme like this should consider all elements of those affected to ensure the scheme is fair and just. I have an extensive understanding of the issues in this matter, being an ex electrician who had worked his way through management to senior positions in the industry, but my requests to become involved in the talks were ignored by Richard Slaven & Co. They were simply not interested in having any real debate of the issues with someone at the heart of the matter. This appears to be confirmed by the evidence given by the trade union representatives to the select committee yesterday, who appear to have received a similarly cold shoulder.

So this looks like it could yet run for years and years, during which, the banker could possibly decide to reduce or even retract his offer as he sometimes does on the game show.

There are many other important factors to consider and as promised, I will try to expand on these over the next few days in a bid to help those affected come to some kind of logical decision.

Three to five times more?

The trade union representatives who gave evidence to the select committee on Monday stated that their lawyers believe that blacklisted workers could receive three to five times more than they would from the compensation scheme under their claims.

I hope to provide impartial information to blacklisted workers to help them understand what they may receive under the compensation scheme in due course, but those workers approaching the trade unions should ask for a clear written explanation of what they could receive based on the information in their blacklist file.

It is my view that as the unions have now made this statement under evidence, that they should now back this up in writing, stating clearly their assessment of what each worker could receive under a successful claim.

I'd therefore recommend that if blacklisted workers are considering a claim via one of the trade unions, that they write to them enclosing their file and asking for a clear assessment of what they would receive under a successful claim. 

I would also recommend that blacklisted workers also read the posts on this website about the trade union's historical involvement in this scandal before considering having them represent them. The posts are easily found via the 'Index' page below.


So to summarize, following this process logically, this is where we're at:

1. Establish what you could receive under the scheme.
2. Establish what you could receive under a claim.
3. Establish the time it would take to complete the claim.

Another factor I failed to mention above is the possibility of an appeal by the construction companies should the blacklisting claims be successful in the High Court. Considering their legal stance for the last nine years, I would say it's highly possible they would appeal, which would drag matters on way beyond the April 2016 target.

The strengths and weaknesses of a claim

Some interesting points came out of the select committee hearing on Wednesday. In this we learned that Richard Slaven & Co could not justify how they came to the compensation figures, apart from some vague references to what Slaven felt a claimant could recover via the courts, based on his 30 years or so experience.

He did however make a very interesting point about the level of cross examination a Claimant would have to undertake, especially in relation to their attempt to mitigate their losses.

I was cross examined over three days at my Tribunal in 2006 and although I was telling the truth the entire time, I still lost my claim. 

Another factor to consider here is the test cases. The Guney Clark Ryan claim is headed by Steve Acheson (& others). I have expressed reservations about Steve's claim on this website under the following post, so you may wish to consider this:


Do you really think some of these workers could not find any work for the last fifteen years? 

I recall a conversation with Steve Acheson following his interview with Newsnight in March 2009, which was filmed from what appeared to be a relatively new and nicely furnished conservatory at his home. I remember saying to him that this did not look like the home of someone who had suffered such financial hardship for so long.

And Dave Smith, who until the commencement of legal action was portraying himself as a DJ on his Twitter page. 


I have no idea if he was paid for such acts, but he will undoubtedly be questioned in great detail about every step he took to mitigate his losses.

So Acheson's "I've only received 16 wage packets in 10 years" and Smith's "My kids were on milk tokens" will come under great scrutiny should this go to trial.

I must stress again that this post is only drafted to help blacklisted workers consider the current offer on the table. You have to establish the following:

1. How much would I get under the compensation scheme?
2. Are the amounts offered under the scheme likely to go up over the next two years or so?
3. How much would I get under a successful claim via Guney Clark Ryan or one of the trade unions?
4. How long will it take to complete such a claim and would this be appealed by the construction companies?
5. How strong are the test cases and how likely are they to succeed?

Next Up: How I can help.

Friday, 11 July 2014


Over 30 paid lawyers at the High Court taking dirty corporate money to defend complicit construction company directors and managers.

Those named in this scandal may be able to throw unlimited amounts of money at lawyers, whilst continuing to deprive those affected of reasonable compensation, but their children, grandchildren and their children will most certainly one day go on the Internet to learn about their ancestors, and it will all be there in black and white.

The shame of what they did...

Saturday, 5 July 2014


I hope to make an announcement on here very soon on the plans I've been making to help blacklisted workers process their compensation claims.

Please note that this will not be before the select committee hearings next Monday and Wednesday.

Friday, 11 April 2014


The compensation scheme is about to be launched and if reports in the press are correct, without the involvement of the trade unions.

This is a positive move forward for the many blacklisted workers who are not privileged to be part of the Guney Clark Ryan and GMB High Court claims, which amount to approximately 200 of the 3,200 blacklisted workers. 

This has gone on for far too long now and in my view, people should be allowed to accept £3,000 or whatever amount they are offered if they see fit and have no other solid offer of legitimate legal representation.

All blacklisted workers will soon receive details of the scheme and as such, I've held discussions with a reputable firm of solicitors with a view to processing these claims on behalf of workers who, like me, have absolutely no desire to be represented by certain trade unions.

I will post details on here as and when they become available.

Friday, 28 March 2014


By far the most accurate article to date about how the blacklisting scandal was exposed:


Steve Acheson's quotes about me from our early conversations in 2006 however are pure fiction.

E.g. "I know you think I'm a wretch" and "I think I'm being blacklisted myself and my wife said to me, now you know how it must have felt for the people you were targeting".

I've been divorced since 1998. 

Friday, 24 January 2014


Last Wednesday the Scottish Affairs Committee heard evidence from four national officers from Unite, Ucatt and the GMB. Not a single question was put to them about the trade union collusion and cover up.

Today we learn via the Construction Enquirer that Ucatt ex-President and London Regional Secretary, John Flavin is stating that trade union officers and officials have helped blacklist workers.

The article also states that the Scottish Affairs Committee have also denied him the chance to present his evidence.

Something stinks...